Review Process
By the NewEdgePolicy Editorial Team · Last updated 13 July 2026
Every page follows the same workflow: research from primary sources, draft, evidence-check, editorial review, publish with a review date, then re-review on a schedule.
The workflow
- Research — gather primary sources (see our Research Methodology).
- Draft — write the explanation and attach evidence records to material claims.
- Evidence check — verify each claim against its source and assign a confidence level.
- Editorial review — check for accuracy, clarity, balance, and that nothing reads like a sales pitch.
- Publish — the page goes live carrying a visible last-reviewed date.
- Scheduled re-review — pages are revisited on a cadence, and immediately when a relevant rule changes.
Where expert reviewers fit
Our architecture supports a named, qualified reviewer per page. Until we onboard IRDAI-licensed or otherwise qualified reviewers, content is reviewed by the NewEdgePolicy Editorial Team and we do not attach a reviewer name we cannot stand behind. See our Future Expert Framework.
Keeping this honest. If any statement here is inaccurate, out of date, or unclear, please tell us. We log corrections with the date they were made. This page is reviewed on our standard editorial cycle.